The greatest letter to the editor ever

Been working a bit, and a bit behind. But I've been itching to put this up, because... well, just read and learn:

Empirical evidence
TO THE EDITOR: Janet Duprey is wrong. This is an equal-rights issue, not a civil-rights violation or deprivation. She's confused by her own admission. Do we allow the condemnation of others to suddenly influence our decision-making processes? What basis/fact does she rely on to determine that she can support gay marriage/civil union law? None!

Two opposites attract and stand side by side, equal, not separated, always, fact. Two same men opposite another two same women equal four sames. They're already together and that makes them equal to one another not opposite the other equal, ever, fact. Two separate same sexes men/women together (not possible) verses one set of opposites that equals four against one, five against one, three against one and one half against one, something other than any of them? Which is it, could it be all of them?

Confusion. Even turning the sames 180 degrees just to separate them, allowing them to stand side by side, is not equal. Get out six magnets if you don't believe this. The equalibrium is disturbed forever. The laws of gravity prove the confusion. Everything is already equal. A united woman and man allowed this procreated fact, but the woman bore this fact. I'm her equal when I'm united with another of her equal procreated self. Until then I remain her opposite.

David Lapier

Plattsburgh